Patent=monopoly: a legal fiction
نویسندگان
چکیده
s included below are as written by the author(s) and are unedited.
منابع مشابه
The software patent debate
It was never the object of patent laws to grant a monopoly for every trifling device, every shadow of a shade of an idea, which would naturally and spontaneously occur to any skilled mechanic or operator in the ordinary progress of manufactures. Such an indiscriminate creation of exclusive privileges tends rather to obstruct than to stimulate invention. It creates a class of speculative schemer...
متن کاملRunner-up patents: is monopoly inevitable?
Exclusive patents sacrifice product competition to provide firms incentives to innovate. We characterize an alternative mechanism whereby later inventors are allowed to share the patent if they discover within a certain time period of the first inventor. These runner-up patents increase social welfare under very general conditions. Furthermore, we show that the time window during which later in...
متن کاملInnovations and Tournaments in an Endogenous Growth Framework
In the context of a patent race, if innovation is sequential and there is no cross licensing, patents offer the patent owner monopoly control over his innovation, al lowing him to block all relative future R&D. Against this background, this thesis shows that patent protection can foster innovation because it offers the innovator an incentive to innovate. However, the monopoly that the patent h...
متن کاملRaising the Stakes in Patent Cases
One of the fundamental goals of a patent system is to encourage the research and development of the most socially valuable inventions—those innovations that will produce the greatest benefits for society at large. If the government could determine in advance which inventions are most socially valuable, it could simply offer direct rewards for their development. The fact that the United States h...
متن کاملSocial Welfare Loss in Antidepressant and Antipsychotic Pharmaceutical Markets
We study allocative inefficiency under monopoly using a two-good general-equilibrium monopoly production model. Individuals are heterogeneous with respect to preferences. We compare social welfare under monopoly with welfare under perfect competition. We then apply this model to the antidepressant and antipsychotic pharmaceutical markets. We find that, for nine specific drugs, annual social-wel...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014